When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. By way of example, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (such as those in clear violation of established case regulation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal hasn't but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in acquiring case legislation in common law than professors in civil regulation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much from the exposition in the legislation in civil regulation traditions is completed by academics somewhat than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals like Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied very little on legal scholarship; Hence, at the turn with the twentieth century, it had been extremely rare to find out an instructional writer quoted within a legal decision (besides Potentially with the academic writings of notable judges such as Coke and Blackstone).
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is often a regulation that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, relatively than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and policies targeted at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety times to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided because of the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the law. This example of case regulation refers to two cases heard inside the state court, at the same level.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) here Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.